Before You Sign, or Before You Renew  ·  One AI tool reviewed against your contract and your state’s law
AI Vendor Review  ·  Fixed-Scope Engagement

One AI Tool. One Written Answer. Before You Sign.

Conducted personally by Dr. Reginald Griffin, Ed.D.  ·  Sitting K-12 principal  ·  Founder, Novo Innovative Pathways

A district’s AI risk lives in its contracts, and most districts do not have the staff to read them closely. Certifications are paid for by vendors and check public policies. Ratings cover product categories. Neither reads your contract. This review does.

$895
Per Tool, Invoiced After Intake
4
Review Areas Scored
10
Business Days to Findings

When Utah tested the live network traffic of 100 school apps, 44 of the 85 with signed privacy agreements collected data the agreement did not permit (Edition 31). The amended COPPA Rule made disclosure of a child’s data for AI training a separate consent question that FERPA does not answer (Edition 14). And vendors now switch AI on by default (Edition 39). If a district cannot verify a privacy agreement, it cannot verify an AI clause about training, retention, or human review.

The Novo Review Standard

01

Data and Privacy Terms

What the tool collects, whether that matches the agreement, retention and deletion, subprocessors, FERPA, COPPA consent under 13, PPRA, and your state’s student privacy law.

02

Model Training and AI Behavior

Whether district data trains or improves any model, including the vendor’s model provider. Whether AI features are on by default and can be turned off by school or grade.

03

Evidence Claims

What the vendor says the tool does for learning, and what stands behind it: independent study, external study under way, internal data only, or nothing.

04

Contract and Governance Gaps

Audit rights, breach notice, change-of-terms notice, protection of student data in a sale or bankruptcy, and a named person for any grade, placement, or discipline decision.

The Call You Receive

GreenReady for students as contracted.
YellowReady with conditions. The contract language to request is included.
RedNot ready. The gaps and what would change the answer.

What You Receive

A written review scored across the four areas above
A green, yellow, or red call on student readiness
The contract language to request, written to sit alongside a national or state data privacy agreement
A policy check showing which sections of your AI policy the tool touches, keyed to the federal and state law that applies to your district
A 30-minute readout with Dr. Griffin for your technology, curriculum, or cabinet lead

Pricing

Single Review
$895
one tool
  • Written review and call
  • Contract language to request
  • 30-minute readout
  • Rush in 5 days: add $300
Standard · Annual
$5,950
ten reviews per year
  • Everything in Essentials
  • A quarterly call with Dr. Griffin
  • Consortia and RESAs: ask about shared reviews

Invoiced after a free 20-minute intake confirms scope. If the review is not the right fit, you pay nothing. Ohio districts that completed the $497 HB 96 Compliance Audit receive their first review at $695.

How It Works

Common Questions

Is this legal advice?

No. It is a governance and procurement review written by a school leader. It tells you what to ask for and why. Confirm final contract terms with your district’s counsel.

The tool already has a privacy certification. Why review it?

Certifications are paid for by vendors and check public policies against a rubric. They do not read your contract, and most do not address AI training, default-on features, or evidence of learning.

Do you take money from vendors?

No. Novo takes no commissions, referral fees, or product affiliations. We Don’t Sell AI. We Govern It.

Fixed Scope · Free Intake · Vendor-Neutral

Send Us One AI Tool

Start with the tool you are least sure about. Direct with Dr. Griffin, no sales team.

Not ready to send a tool? Track your state’s requirements on the State Legislation Hub, or start with the free 10-Domain Readiness Brief.